Model Risk Management

Your complete guide on Model Risk Management
Model Risk Management (MRM) is the discipline of identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks arising from the use of models. As organizations increasingly rely on statistical models, machine learning, and AI systems, managing model risk has become essential for ensuring reliable decision-making, regulatory compliance, and operational resilience.
Originally rooted in financial services, MRM is now relevant to any organization using models in business-critical processes. This page provides a structured overview of Model Risk Management and links to detailed resources covering each component in depth.
Start with the basics: models and model risk
Before exploring Model Risk Management in detail, it is important to start with the basics: what exactly is a model, and where does model risk come from?
What is a model?
In the context of Model Risk Management, a model is a system that transforms inputs into quantitative outputs to support decision-making.
According to SR 26-2, a model is:
“a quantitative method… that processes input data into quantitative estimates”
Models are therefore simplified representations of reality, combining data, assumptions, and mathematical logic to produce outputs.
For a full definition, examples, and what is not considered a model: https://www.yields.io/insights/what-is-a-model
What is model risk?
Model risk is the risk of adverse consequences resulting from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs.
This can lead to:
- financial loss
- poor decision-making
- reputational damage
Model risk arises because models are inherently imperfect and can be:
- wrongly designed
- incorrectly implemented
- misused or misunderstood
For a detailed explanation, real-world examples, and types of model risk: https://www.yields.io/insights/what-is-model-risk
What is Model Risk Management?
Model Risk Management is the practice of managing the risks associated with models throughout their lifecycle.
It is not limited to checking whether a model works from a technical perspective. Model Risk Management ensures that models are properly designed, governed, independently challenged, correctly implemented, and continuously monitored once they are in use.
In practice, organizations need to answer questions such as:
- What models are in use?
- Who owns them?
- How material are they?
- Have they been independently validated?
- Are they still performing as intended?
- Are they being used in the right context?
Model Risk Management is therefore a structured discipline that applies risk management principles to models, similar to how organizations manage credit risk, cyber risk, or operational risk.
The goal is to reduce the likelihood and impact of model failures by introducing governance, controls, and assurance across the full model lifecycle.
In practice, this means managing models beyond development alone. For example, a bank using a credit risk model must ensure that:
- the underlying data remains representative over time
- the model continues to perform under changing economic conditions
- its outputs are interpreted correctly by business users
- any limitations are clearly documented and understood
Similarly, in AI-driven use cases such as recommendation systems or automated decisioning, Model Risk Management ensures that models remain reliable, fair, and aligned with business objectives as they evolve.
Rather than focusing on individual models in isolation, MRM provides a structured way to manage model risk at scale across the organization.
For a deeper explanation and examples, see: https://www.yields.io/insights/what-is-model-risk-management
Discover how Yields can help you with Model Risk Management
The Model Risk Management Framework
Model Risk Management is built on a structured framework that aligns with general risk management principles.
Core components include:
- governance and accountability
- model identification and inventory
- model validation and independent challenge
- ongoing monitoring
- issue management and remediation
These elements ensure that models are properly controlled throughout their lifecycle.
In practice, these components are closely interconnected. For example, the model inventory determines which models require validation, while monitoring activities feed back into risk assessments and governance decisions.
This interconnected structure ensures that Model Risk Management is not a set of isolated controls, but a continuous process that adapts as models evolve.
Explore the full framework in detail: https://www.yields.io/insights/model-risk-management-framework
Model Inventory and Risk Tiering
A central component of Model risk management is maintaining a complete overview of all models in use.
A model inventory allows organizations to:
- track all models across the organization
- assign ownership
- classify models based on risk (tiering)
- determine required validation and monitoring effort
Without a proper inventory, model risk cannot be effectively managed.
Learn more: https://www.yields.io/insights/what-is-model-inventory
The Model Lifecycle
Models are not static assets. They evolve over time and must be managed across their entire lifecycle.
Typical lifecycle stages include:
- ideation and planning
- model development
- independent validation
- production deployment
- ongoing monitoring
- retirement
Each stage introduces specific risks that must be controlled.
While the stages of the lifecycle are often presented sequentially, in practice they form a continuous loop. Insights from monitoring and validation frequently lead to model updates, revalidation, or even full redevelopment.
This makes lifecycle management a critical component of effective Model Risk Management.
Read the full model lifecycle breakdown: https://www.yields.io/insights/what-is-model-lifecycle
Discover how Yields can help you manage your model lifecyle.
Model Validation and Independent Challenge
Model validation is one of the most critical components of Model Risk Management.
It provides an independent assessment of whether a model is:
- conceptually sound
- correctly implemented
- fit for its intended use
Validation typically includes:
- backtesting
- stress testing
- sensitivity analysis
- benchmarking
Deep dive into model validation: https://www.yields.io/insights/what-is-model-validation
Discover how Yields can help you manage your Model Validation.
Governance and the Three Lines of Defence
Model risk managament is typically organized using the Three Lines of Defence model:
- First line: model developers and owners
- Second line: independent validation and oversight
- Third line: internal audit
This structure ensures clear accountability and independent control.
Learn how this works in practice: https://www.yields.io/insights/the-three-lines-of-defence-in-model-risk-management
Regulations and Supervisory Expectations
Model Risk Management is strongly influenced by regulation, especially in financial services.
It is important to distinguish between:
- legislation (laws)
- regulation (binding rules)
- guidelines (supervisory expectations)
While guidelines may not be legally binding, they are critical in practice as regulators use them to assess compliance.
Model Risk Management requirements differ by region:
- United States (SR 11-7 (now SR 26-2) and related guidance): https://www.yields.io/insights/us-banking-regulations
- European Union (CRD, CRR, EU AI Act): https://www.yields.io/insights/eu-banking-regulations
- United Kingdom (SS1/23, PRA Rulebook): https://www.yields.io/insights/uk-banking-regulations
- Global overview: https://www.yields.io/insights/global-banking-regulations
Model Risk Management in the Age of AI
The rise of AI introduces new challenges for Model Risk Management.
Compared to traditional models, AI systems:
- are more complex and less transparent
- depend heavily on data quality
- can introduce bias and fairness risks
- require continuous monitoring
This makes strong MRM practices even more critical.
See how MRM is evolving: https://www.yields.io/insights/five-model-risk-management-trends-defining-2026
How to implement Model Risk Management
Implementing Model Risk Management requires more than defining policies. It involves putting in place a structured and scalable approach that covers all models across the organization.
While implementations differ depending on size and regulatory context, most organizations follow a similar set of steps.
1. Establish a model inventory
Start by identifying all models in use and documenting them in a centralized inventory. This creates visibility and forms the foundation for all further controls.
2. Define governance and ownership
Assign clear ownership for each model and define roles and responsibilities across the organization. This typically includes model owners, validators, and oversight functions.
3. Apply risk-based tiering
Not all models require the same level of control. Classifying models based on their complexity and impact allows organizations to apply proportional governance and validation efforts.
4. Introduce independent validation
Ensure that models are reviewed by an independent function before and during their use. This provides an objective assessment of model quality and limitations.
5. Monitor performance over time
Models must be continuously monitored to detect performance degradation, data drift, or changing conditions that may affect their reliability.
6. Establish issue management and remediation
When issues are identified, they should be tracked, prioritized, and resolved through a structured process.
This step-by-step approach helps organizations move from ad hoc model management to a consistent and scalable Model Risk Management framework.
Common Challenges in Model Risk Management
Despite its importance, many organizations struggle to implement Model Risk Management effectively.
Common challenges include:
- Limited visibility: models are spread across teams, often tracked in spreadsheets or local environments
- Lack of standardization: validation and documentation practices vary between teams
- Manual processes: validation, monitoring, and reporting are often time-consuming and difficult to scale
- Unclear ownership: responsibilities for models are not always well defined
- Fragmented tooling: different tools are used for development, validation, and monitoring without integration
- AI adoption outpacing governance: new machine learning models are deployed faster than governance frameworks evolve
These challenges make it difficult to maintain control as the number and complexity of models increases.
Why Model Risk Management Matters
Model Risk Management is no longer optional.
As models become central to decision-making, organizations must ensure they are:
- reliable
- explainable
- compliant
- properly governed
A strong Model Risk Management framework enables organizations to scale the use of models and AI while maintaining control and trust.
Explore Model Risk Management in Depth
This page provides an overview of Model Risk Management. For detailed guidance on each component, explore the linked resources throughout this page.
About the
Author(s)

Jos Gheerardyn is the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Yields. Prior to his current role, he worked as both a manager and an analyst in the field of quantitative finance. With nearly 20 years of experience, he has worked with leading international investment banks and start-up companies. Jos is the author of multiple patents that apply quantitative risk management techniques to the energy balancing market. Jos holds a PhD in superstring theory from the University of Leuven.



Efrem Bonfiglioli is a seasoned model and AI risk management professional with a passion for advising model developers and validators on best practices for effective model and AI use case management.He has held various roles related to model risk management across multiple lines of defense in leading global banking institutions, covering a wide range of asset classes and risk types. Efrem is a visiting professor at universities in Italy and the UK where he teaches courses ranging from foundational financial subjects to advanced quantitative modelling.He earned his PhD in Financial Mathematics, where he focused on researching the applications of jump-diffusion models in the context of derivatives pricing.

